| General information | ||||||
| Name: | Claroideoglomus etunicatum | |||||
| Mycorriza Bank #: | Location | Sate | Country | Latitude / Longitude | ||
| CMCC/AM-1206 | Jaisalmer | Rajasthan | India | 26.9157° N, 70.9083° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1207 | Jodhpur | Rajasthan | India | 26.2389° N, 73.0243° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1215 | Jaisalmer | Rajasthan | India | 26.9157° N, 70.9083° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1219 | Ahmedabad | Gujarat | India | 23.0225° N, 72.5714° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1220 | Jamnagar | Gujarat | India | 22.4707° N, 70.0577° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1221 | Jaipur | Rajasthan | India | 26.9157° N, 70.9083° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1223 | Jaisalmer | Rajasthan | India | 26.9157° N, 70.9083° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1224 | Jaisalmer | India | 26.9157° N, 70.9083° E | |||
| CMCC/AM-1225 | Mukteshwar | Uttarakhand | India | 29.4604° N, 79.6558° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1226 | Jodhpur | Rajasthan | India | 26.9157° N, 70.9083° E | ||
| CMCC/AM-1227 | Jaipur | Rajasthan | India | 26.9157° N, 70.9083° E | ||
| Classification and associated taxa | |
| Kingdom: | Fungi |
| Division: | Glomeromycota |
| Class: | Glomeromycetes |
| Order: | Glomerales |
| Family: | Claroideoglomeraceae |
| Genus: | Claroideoglomus |
| Biochemical information | |
| Fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) | C-12,C-14,C-14:1,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1 C-12,C-14,C-14:1,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1 C-12,C-14,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1 C-12,C-14,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1,C-18:2,C-18:3 C-12,C-14,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1,C-18:2 C-12,C-14,C-16,C-16:1,C-18 C-12,C-14,C-14:1,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1 C-12,C-14,C-14:1,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1 C-12,C-14,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1 C-12,C-14,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1,C-18:2,C-18:3 C-12,C-14,C-14:1,C-16,C-16:1,C-18,C-18:1 |
| Functional information | ||||
| Percentage enhancement of morphological parameters as compared with un-inoculated control on Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) | ||||
| Shoot Length | Number of branches | Shoot fresh weight | Shoot dry weight | |
| CMCC/AM-1206 | 35.5 | 7.9 | 104.7 | 34.9 |
| CMCC/AM-1207 | 45.3 | 2.6 | 85.4 | 28.1 |
| CMCC/AM-1215 | 3.6 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 8.5 |
| CMCC/AM-1219 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 5.3 | 4.8 |
| CMCC/AM-1220 | 3.3 | 21 | 5.5 | 0.5 |
| CMCC/AM-1221 | 0.4 | 13.1 | 3.2 | 25.9 |
| CMCC/AM-1223 | 0.3 | 8.1 | 3 | 5.9 |
| CMCC/AM-1224 | 1.6 | 5.2 | 5.8 | 32.7 |
| CMCC/AM-1225 | 1.6 | 2.6 | 3.6 | 27.2 |
| CMCC/AM-1226 | 9.6 | 5.2 | 12.5 | 22 |
| CMCC/AM-1227 | 3.6 | 21 | 20.2 | 42.8 |
| Percentage enhancement of macro nutrient parameters as compared with un-inoculated control on Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) | ||||
| Nitrogen | Phosphorus | Potassium | ||
| CMCC/AM-1206 | 1.44 | 389.06 | 215.38 | |
| CMCC/AM-1207 | 2.55 | 260.36 | 195.32 | |
| CMCC/AM-1215 | 0.62 | 414.80 | 132.39 | |
| CMCC/AM-1219 | 1.15 | 260.36 | 136.73 | |
| CMCC/AM-1220 | 0.12 | 260.36 | 254.51 | |
| CMCC/AM-1221 | 0.78 | 247.49 | 116.50 | |
| CMCC/AM-1223 | 0.55 | 118.79 | 136.70 | |
| CMCC/AM-1224 | 1.44 | 170.27 | 124.54 | |
| CMCC/AM-1225 | 1.15 | 183.14 | 136.60 | |
| CMCC/AM-1226 | 0.51 | 170.27 | 124.76 | |
| CMCC/AM-1227 | 0.60 | 260.36 | 144.26 | |
| Percentage enhancement of micro nutrient parameters with as compared with un-inoculated control on Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) | ||||
| Iron | Manganese | Zinc | Copper | |
| CMCC/AM-1206 | 144.45 | 591.07 | NS | 1300 |
| CMCC/AM-1207 | 237.74 | 410.46 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1215 | 4.14 | 298.92 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1219 | NS | 104.87 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1220 | NS | 158.63 | NS | 600 |
| CMCC/AM-1221 | 119.61 | 431.39 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1223 | 242.83 | 543.63 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1224 | 102.82 | 201.51 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1225 | 357.30 | 331.91 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1226 | 143.49 | 284.21 | NS | NS |
| CMCC/AM-1227 | 8.21 | 290.75 | NS | NS |
| Biocontrol efficacy * | ||||
| Pathogen | Fusarium oxysporum | Rhizoctonia solani | ||
| CMCC/AM-1206 | 42.22 | 25.56 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1207 | 44.40 | 35.00 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1215 | 33.33 | 37.50 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1219 | 33.33 | 12.50 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1220 | 22.22 | 12.50 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1221 | 30.56 | 37.50 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1223 | 33.33 | 12.50 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1224 | 33.33 | 12.50 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1225 | 22.22 | 37.50 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1226 | 33.30 | 31.00 | ||
| CMCC/AM-1227 | 22.22 | 37.50 | ||
| Spores of Claroideoglomus etunicatum | |
| Spore Shape: The majority of mature spores are globose and oval in shape. Spore Color: Young juvenile spores were hyaline and yellow to brownish when mature. Average diameter: 90-250 μm  |
|
|
|
Layer 1 (L1): This is the evanescent outermost mucilaginous layer which is formed in young juvenile spores and also along the subtending hyphal wall. This layer degrades or sloughs off as the spore matures and at maturity, it may be absent or present in patches. Developmentally, this wall layer is the first layer to be formed in the juvenile spores. Generally, organic materials gets accumulated on the wall surface resulting in no reaction in Melzer's reagent. In some young spores, this is stained pink with Melzers reagent. The average thickness of this layer lies between 0.5 to and 2.5 μm. Layer 2 (L2): The inner layer also known as laminated wall layer is initiated as a single layer. The subsequent adherent sub-layers are formed as the spore matures. All the sub-layers possess the same phenotypic properties. Stains light brown to red brown in Melzer's and the average thickness lies between 4.0 to and 6.5 μm in mature spores. |
